Jim Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence in
Washington, has been fingered as the “new guy under the bus.” The Obama team is now saying that there was
conflicting information, incomplete information and incorrect information that
caused their “confusion” as to whether or not it was a terrorist act at
Benghazi. In creating this tidy new
story, Clapper supposedly told Obama that it was terror, then told others something
different, which explains why Obama said what he did in the Rose Garden and why
Obama’s White House goons started saying it wasn’t terrorism or that it was “too early” to
say it was terrorism.
COMMENTS:
Which also explains why they blamed the video? I mean, if it was “too early” to say what
caused the attack, how could they at the same time insist it was the
video? If it was terrorism, as Obama now
says he said it was, why did he leave town on a campaign trip? There were two prior attacks on the
Consulate; why did they draw down security protection there? Why did Obama throw Rice, Clinton and now
Clapper under the bus? Are they picking
on Clapper because he said back in May they he intended to leave his job this
fall? This cover-up has more twists and
turns than a drunk in a pretzel factory.
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. Whatever happened about the story of the U.S. Security
Chief assassinated in Yemen? (Moreland ~
Pasco, WA)
A. It’s been buried by the White House. That death and the massacre at Benghazi add
up to tremendous victories for Al Qaeda and they make Obama and his
proclamations that Al Qaeda was “on the run” look totally absurd. The recent wave of anti-West demonstrations
across the Muslim world and the massacre at Benghazi have triggered mounting
concern among analysts and U.S. officials that Al Qaeda is exploiting the chaos
that has followed the Arab Spring's overthrow of dictatorships aligned with the
United States. Obama doesn’t want to
take the heat for this blundering on his part.
Q. Obama political adviser David Axelrod went after Gallup
Polls a few weeks ago, trying to twist their arms in Obama’s favor. What ever happened to that? (Mandy ~ Tempe, AZ)
A. It got buried in other news of the day. However, Gallup came out yesterday showing Romney
in the lead 52% to 47%. Obama has never
been over 50% in these polls and no person under 50% at this stage of the game
going into an election has ever won.
Keep those prayers and efforts going.
Q. If Obama can’t get along with Congress now, in his first
term, how can he expect to get anything accomplished with Congress in his
second term? (Dawn ~ San Francisco, CA)
A. That is a point well-made but not brought up enough. He couldn’t get things done when he
controlled both Houses. He can’t get his
own budget, the one he created, passed by his own Democratic-controlled Senate;
how can he govern anything if both
houses are controlled by Republicans? Maybe
he intends to abolish Congress?
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“By a lie, a man... annihilates his dignity
as a man.” ~ Immanuel Kant
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment