The mostly unidentified survivors of the Benghazi Massacre are afraid to come forward and tell the story of what actually happened; they are afraid of retribution and have been warned by officials not to discuss anything that happened on the night of the Massacre. The White House has denied the allegation.
COMMENTS:
The denial comes from the same administration that denied
the attack was a terrorist attack from the get-go and marched Susan Rice out to
claim the event was sparked by an anti-Islamic video. The White House is also refusing to cooperate
with Congressional investigators. Now is
the time for every American in the country to step forward and be heard loud
and clear in the halls of Congress.
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. Why is Obama all of the sudden wanting to talk with
the Republicans and why is he holding out the olive branch, after four plus years of
treating them like dirt? (Trudy ~
Calabasas, CA)
A. Because they stuck together and refused to budge or fold
on Sequestration. In that moment, they
finally showed that they have what it takes to fight the tough game. Obama now recognizes that he can no longer
issue dictates and expect results. So, I
guess he’s over his snit.
Q. I just heard that intelligence analysts are now saying
the number one security threat to the U.S. is not nuclear attack, but
cyber-attack? A cyber-attack can’t kill
us. (Ernesto ~ Taos, NM)
A. You’re wrong, hopefully not dead wrong. Virtually everything we do these days has a
computer behind it, and most computers have a wired or wireless connection to
some other computer or the Internet.
From crossing guards on railroad tracks; to keeping your car engine
running; to shipments of food, gasoline and energy; to traffic control systems;
to missile launches; to control of medical surgery… there are hundreds of
direct impacts on life that involve computers.
A cyber-attack against them could be much deadlier than drinking a
32-ounce soft drink in New York City.
Q. What’s your opinion about the fight between Ted Cruz and
Dianne Feinstein the other day over gun control, and the fact that she called
him “arrogant and antagonistic” after the fact?
(Jerrilyn ~ Wolf Point, MT)
A. She obviously does not know the meaning of the
words. She doesn’t hesitate to display
her own arrogance; she’s done it many times to many people. In terms of being arrogant and antagonistic,
she could even replace O’Reilly on Fox News.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
"The 'shut up' line has happened only once in six
years." ~ Bill O’Reilly responding to a viewer who said if he was so
concerned about public figures being bad role models for children, he should
stop interrupting guests and telling them to shut up, Nov. 15, 2002 (Watch
video of O'Reilly telling various guests to “Shut
up!”)
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment