The Supreme Court is hearing the ObamaCare case and
something not picked up by the liberal press has occurred that could signal
what is coming in June’s decision. The
argument was put forth that the case should not be heard at all by the Court
because an obscure 1867 law prevented such cases from moving forward
when they involved tax increases. Judge
Ruth Bader Ginsburg commented, in response to the argument, "This is not a
revenue-raising measure, because, if it's successful, they won't -- nobody will
pay the penalty and there will be no revenue to raise."
COMMENTS:
Could it be that the Court has had its fill of Obama’s
flaunting of the Constitution on all fronts?
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. Why is Obama off on another junket? (Leonard ~ Alta Loma, CA)
A. He wanted to be out of the country while the Supreme
Court heard the ObamaCare case. And, he’s
hoping the press coverage of his trip will detract from the coverage of the
Court.
Q. Assuming the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare, how
do you think Obama will react? (LeeAnn ~
Concord, CA)
A. If history is any indication, he will simply issue an
Executive Order to get around the Supreme Court decision. That’s how he deals with a Congressional
decision he doesn’t like.
Q. A story is leaking out that Romney relied on the late Ted
Kennedy to help him pass Romney Care. Is
that true? (Bo ~ Jackson Hole, WY)
A. He frequently referred to Kennedy as “my collaborator and
friend.” Ooooo, kissy-kissy, huggy-huggy.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“When the Supreme Court moved to Washington
in 1800, it was provided with no books, which probably accounts for the high
quality of early opinions.” ~ Robert
Jackson
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment