Monday, December 2, 2013

BOGUS EXCUSE FOR DOMESTIC SPYING



Over the long weekend, Representative Mike Rogers from Michigan and Senator Dianne Feinstein from California laid out the case that the nature of terrorism is changing and therefore we need to have higher levels of domestic spying in order to protect ourselves in the U.S. 

COMMENTS:
I’m not the first one to say it; “A nation which is willing to give up its freedoms in order to have security will end up having neither.”  Their argument stinks.  Would you be willing to live in a jail to keep the bad guys from getting to you?  If the terrorists change the way they do business, we need to change the ways we monitor them; we do not need to increase the level of spying on ourselves.  It is false reasoning like theirs that is destroying our country from within. 

TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. I was paying $495 a month for insurance on myself.  I had a $200 annual deductible and no copays.  ObamaCare wants to charge me $1,100 per month and nail me for a $4,000 deductible.  I will get a $4,000 subsidy.  They say I’m saving money.  Their insurance policy stinks.  What do I do?  (Archie ~ Petaluma, CA)
A. Look at it this way: the government is giving you a $4,000 subsidy, so that wipes out the $4,000 deductible, right?  And you won’t have the $200 deductible anymore, so you’re saving money.  It’s just simple Obamamath 101.  Besides, Obama knows what is best for you.  Isn’t that a nice, warm, fuzzy feeling? 

Q. Do you believe an attack from extraterrestrials would unite the world and lead to world peace?  (Karla ~ Helena, MT)
A. Wow!  What do you have in YOUR turkey?  I rate such a scenario to be highly unlikely.  There are credible sightings of UFO’s going back decades; if they wanted to attack us, it would have already been done.  However, if such an invasion occurred yes, the world would unite.  Everyone except the radical Muslims would join forces.  The radical Muslims would try to take advantage of the situation. 

Q. The argument is being put forth again that we need to remove term limits on the President.  Obviously, the progressive left-wing is going to try and force Obama down our throats for a third, or even a fourth term.  What is your reaction? (Eve ~ Coos Bay, OR)
A. At a time when a growing number of citizens are favoring term limits on Congress, I have to say, “Fat chance.”  The Obama situation is a classic example of why we DO need term limits.  He’s corrupt to the end, he uses government capital to purchase his own political power and his political machine extends to the press, the media, Hollywood, the unions and even to his own employees in various agencies who abuse their authorities to oppress and attack those who dare to criticize him. Frankly, I believe he is nothing better than a Hitler in black skin. 

TODAY’S QUOTE:
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” ~ Abraham Lincoln

TODAY’S VIDEO:

No comments:

Post a Comment