BBC NEWS is reporting that Washington’s envoy to Israel, Dan
Shapiro, is saying the US has plans in place to attack Iran if other measures
fail to stop it from developing nuclear weapons.
COMMENTS:
Obama has previously ruled such an attack out, but there is
a growing rumor in Washington circles that Obama will strike in the late fall
if he continues to be behind in the polls and if it looks as if he might lose
the Presidency. Of course, where there is smoke, there is fire, and Obama’s
popularity in the polls surged right after the killing of Bin Laden. The theory is that he would get such a “bump”
in popularity following such a strike and its timed closeness to the November
elections would ensure him a second term.
And, frankly, that is how Obama thinks and works. He will do anything necessary to win so that
he can complete the installation of his Marxist Socialist regime in the
U.S. All of that could be the very
reason Obama has been madder than hell at Israel; he doesn’t want them to steal
his reelection from him by striking themselves, and he wants to stall the date
as much as possible with “talk” and reduced sanctions against Iran.
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. Why does Obama continue to ignore the jobs problem and to
fumble the economy? (Leslie ~
Gardnerville, NV)
A. He just announced, during the G-8 summit at Camp David, "There's
now an emerging consensus that more must be done to promote growth and job
creation right now." Right now only
because his reelection prospects are getting worse by the day. His track record during his first four years
at the helm is convincing more and more people that he should move his
Premiership to Kenya.
Q. So much money is being spent on this election that it has
caused our free and open democratic process to transform from being a vote of
the people to being a “battle of the purses.” How can we stop this “buying” of
our Presidency? (Kim ~ Seattle, WA)
A. Montana has enacted a law to contain campaign
contributions from corporations and a case to overthrow that law is now headed
to the Supreme Court; 22 states side with Montana. The problem is, doesn’t such a law inhibit
the rights of free speech and association? Aren’t our own laws ensuring
individual rights being used against us?
The problem is that we have allowed the worst people in the country to
gain the most political and financial power in the history of the world. We need to change ourselves before we can
change that fact.
Q. I just saw that Google is coming out with a new
technology that will make available the precise location of every ship at sea
to the world public. Can’t that hurt our
U.S. Naval security? (Josh ~ Redding,
CA)
A. Absolutely. But, I’ve
never seen anything, including national security, stand in the way of a
business wanting to increase its bottom line.
That’s why you have Wiki-Leaks. I was born and reared in an era where
you protected the national security at all costs, even if it meant making less
money.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“The
ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.” ~ John F. Kennedy
TODAY’S VIDEO:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1647162240001/obamas-name-removed-from-the-ballot-in-arizona
No comments:
Post a Comment