Saturday, June 30, 2012

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REFUSES TO PROSECUTE HOLDER


As expected in most circles, the Justice Department has refused to exercise its Constitutional obligation to prosecute its leader, Eric Holder, after he was held in Contempt of Congress.  Deputy Attorney General James Cole confirmed in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner that the department in fact would not pursue prosecution. The attorney general's withholding of documents pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, he wrote, "does not constitute a crime."  (Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/29/after-holder-contempt-vote-republicans-eye-civil-court-case-to-extract-furious/#ixzz1zEacpsh3)

COMMENTS:
Another in an endless Obama Administration series of “Up yours America and just what are you going to do about it?” messages…  It is a culture of dictatorship that we are dealing with.  Do you want to be ruled by a dictator? 

TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. What is your opinion of Nancy Pelosi and other House members walking out on Holder’s Contempt of Congress vote? (Elias ~ Menlo Park, CA)
A. I guess they were acting out the “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen” idiom.  It speaks volumes about the level of their commitment to America.  Too bad they didn’t keep right on walking…

Q. There’s a presidential election going on in Mexico (tomorrow) and we haven’t heard a word about it.  Are there any ramifications for us?  (Jocko ~ Amargosa Valley, NV)
A. Twelve years after it fell from power, Mexico’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) is on the verge of winning Sunday’s presidential election with a ticket headed by a young, telegenic leader, Enrique Peña Nieto.  The PRI has a long history of close relationships with drug cartels and systemic corruption.  The ramifications for us could be ominous. 

Q. What is it with this ObamaCare tax issue?  First, Obama and his goons swore on a stack of Korans that the costs were not a tax.  Then they argued to the Supreme Court that it was a tax and the Court ruled ObamaCare to be constitutional not under the commerce clause but, because it is a tax.  Now, I hear the White House arguing that it is not a tax, but a penalty.  What’s going on?  (Oz ~ Yuma, AZ)  
A. It’s a “flim-flam, slam-bam thank you ma’am” smoke and mirrors magic trick. In fact, it’s not a tax; it’s a giant screw you.   

TODAY’S QUOTE:
We begin the path toward defeating Mexico's real adversary, who represents authoritarianism and the worst antidemocratic practice, who represents a return to corruption as a system and impunity as conviction. That adversary is Pena Nieto and his party.” ~ Josefina Vazquez Mota

TODAY’S VIDEO:  

No comments:

Post a Comment