The White House has “an obligation” to prevent journalists
from telling the accurate stories of Jihadists, according to Josh Earnest. The proffered theory is that telling it like
it is encourages acts of terrorism against the United States.
COMMENTS:
So what is it? Is
Obama censoring the free press of this country, or is he allowing radical Islam
to do the censoring?
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. Why is Obama risking so much in order to release the
terrorists from Guantanamo? (Angie ~
Mesa, AZ)
A. Perhaps it goes back to his first election in 2008 when
millions of dollars in small, unidentified donations reached his campaign coffers
from the Middle East? I mean, just
saying…
Q. Why, when voting to get rid of Obama’s amnesty plan or to
repeal ObamaCare, don’t the Republicans come with a new plan of their own? (Phil ~ Albuquerque, NM)
A. The Republicans are divided within and probably can’t
agree on such plans, so all they can do is to throw stones.
Q. Americans and Congress are very angry at the way
president Obama is handling the terrorism issues. Will he change course? (Anne ~ Kanab, UT)
A. No. He does not
care what anybody else thinks and he owes nobody anything. And if that doesn’t set well with you, he
doesn’t care about that, either.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of the
people not to listen.” ~ Tommy Smothers
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment