Speaking at a conference for the National Council for
Behavioral Health in Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton said it’s a fallacy to think
that “anybody anywhere” has the right to bear arms.
COMMENTS:
It will be interesting to see if she sticks to her guns as
we go forward to the 2016 elections, if you’ll pardon the play on words.
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. If it is going to be a bi-partisan committee, why
wouldn’t it be an even 50-50 split in membership? (Louise ~ Milwaukee, WI)
A. There are a lot of reasons to consider. For one, the membership of the House has a
Republican majority; a fair representation of their views would provide a
majority on the committee. Similarly,
when the Democrats had the majority and they were investigating Watergate, they
had the majority on the House Committee.
The Democrats insisted on an even split because they want to emasculate
the Committee by rendering it useless; if the Committee wants to issue
subpoenas, for example, and you have six voting for and six against, you have
gridlock. If the Democrats refuse to
show up if they don’t get their way, they are really wearing their agendas on
their sleeves, are they not? Now to the crux
of the issue: If there truly is nothing to hide, why all of the squirming? You’d think they must have snakes in their
jeans.
Q. The Fort Collins, Colorado V.A. Clinic has also been
delaying patient care for vets and covering that fact up. Is this going to be another major scandal for
the Obama Administration, leading to the White House? (Bernice ~ Shelton, WA)
A. If investigators follow the leads to a just and complete
conclusion, I suspect they’ll discover a link to top White House officials. Obama has made no excuse for his
anti-military stance in the past.
Remember that this is the President who said early on in his first term that
he wanted vets to pay for their own medical care and/or insurance. Obama spews venom and hatred wherever he goes
in his consistent efforts to divide Americans and, I believe, to overthrow our
government. I’d call him a jackass, but I hold the animal in higher regard than
the President.
Q. What do you think of the Supreme Court decision stating
that prayer before public meetings is Constitutional? (Uma ~ Peoria, AZ)
A. It was a 5-4 decision, so that is a narrow victory for
those who believe in starting meeting with prayers. If Pelosi or Reid had been allowed to pick
the Supreme Court, the decisions would have been different and if just one
conservative Justice resigns or dies during the next three years and is
replaced by an Obama nominee, you’re going to see a whole new ballgame. The majority rule was that such prayer need
not be non-sectarian. I’m delighted with
the ruling, however, and intend to celebrate with some wine and bread.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has
endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their
use.” ~ Galileo Galilei
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment