Sunday, June 16, 2013

IRS SEIZED MEDICAL RECORDS ILLEGALLY



A class-action lawsuit against the IRS alleges 15 IRS agents improperly seized more than 60 million medical records from 10 million taxpayers while investigating the former employee of a health-care provider.  The suit claims the information allegedly seized includes “information about treatment for any kind of medical concern, including psychological counseling, gynecological counseling, sexual or drug treatment.”

COMMENTS:
Talk about a fishing expedition!  The IRS was evidently in search of material they could use in the tax case of Wesley Snipes.  But, they glommed on to records of  “prominent celebrities, sports personalities” and CEOs, and potentially “the intimate medical records of every state judge in California, every state court employee in California, leading and politically controversial members of the Screen Actors Guild and the Directors Guild, and prominent citizens in the world of entertainment, business and government.” And ObamaCare hasn’t even come under their jurisdiction yet.  Can you image claiming medical expenses of $50,000 as a deduction for cancer treatments and having the I.R.S. seize your records and determining that the treatment was unnecessary and, therefore, taxable?  Do you think for one second that, if you were a conservative anti-President, the liberal President would not hesitate to send the I.R.S. after those records?  I don’t give a damn if it is against the law; this president and his high-handed goons operate around the law. 

TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. What kind of change do you expect in our relationship with Iran and regarding their nuclear program as a result of Ahmadinejad leaving and a new, more moderate president elected?  (Goldie ~ Burney, CA)
A. None.  The Iranian President is a figurehead who takes orders from the ruling religious leaders.  If anything, he may not be as openly belligerent. 

Q. If Russia and Iran are supplying Assad with heavy weaponry in his civil war, what good will the provision of small arms by the U.S. be?  (Cornell ~ Denver, CO)
A. Symbolic.  However, if we supply anything more, like rockets for example, they could fall into the hands of Al Qaeda which makes up a large part of the rebel forces.  If we were going to get involved, it should have been done three years ago, before Al Qaeda stuck their noses into it.  In getting involved at this stage of the game, there is no way for us to win anything, except more enemies.  In the meanwhile, Assad’s atrocities will continue because he knows our cowboy pistols won’t change the war at all. 

Q. I just can’t fathom how serious these scandals are and what they are doing to this country.  (Janet ~ Weed, CA)
A. This is what you get when you elect a political party that wants God out of its platform.  You see, with no God or conscience in the way, they don’t have to answer to anyone for their misdeeds. 

TODAY’S QUOTE:
“We don't want the efficiency of the federal government and the compassion of the IRS to run our health care.” ~ Todd Akin

TODAY’S VIDEO:

No comments:

Post a Comment