Texas Representative Louie Gohmert says he doesn’t believe
the FBI will recommend an indictment for Hillary Clinton in her email probe. He thinks they’ll just hand over the evidence to the
Justice Department and let them decide whether or not to indict, independently
of any FBI recommendation. And he
further thinks that Lynch will not indict.
COMMENTS:
That all makes sense to me.
Obama has to protect himself and his huge entourage of henchmen and
Clinton can’t provide that protection if she’s not in the White House. So, it’s quid pro quo: they cover for each other. And what happens if she does not win the
presidency? I suspect they’re going to
threaten Trump with something or other and demand that he either pass on
pursuing Clinton or they’ll spill the beans about what ever it is. After all, Obama has NSA, CIA, and Google in
his corner right now, so he knows everything there is to know about Trump and
he surely won’t be afraid to use it.
TODAY’S QUERIES & ANSWERS:
Q. With the economy faltering, is it not very dangerous to
be increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour and requiring more positions to
be paid overtime premium pay? (Tessie ~
Glendora, CA)
A. Companies will reduce hiring, use more automation and
unemployment will increase, meaning a bigger tax burden on the people who ARE
working. You cannot legislate
prosperity; you need to keep taxes low, wages commensurate with productivity
and let the free market do what it does best.
Q. I’m astonished that the gun rights community has won yet
another major case, this time in Washington, DC. What does this all mean? (Burl ~ Davenport, IA)
A. D.C., like California and a lot of other states, has a
provision requiring that applicants for concealed carry permits show “good reason
or cause” for obtaining a permit. This
leaves the District, or the state as the case may be, able to arbitrarily deny
a license. The U.S. District Court Judge
correctly ruled that “good reason” cannot be a requirement because people have a
Second Amendment Right to self-protection both inside and outside of their
homes. The Courts may be coming to grips
with the truth about our American Bill of Rights.
Q. The long lines at the airports are, I now understand,
more the result of the TSA union demanding higher wages and benefits for
workers and a “slow down” of productivity in order to get their point
across. Can’t we just fire all of
them? (Beatrice ~ Shingletown, CA)
A. That would be a “Reaganesque” move and certainly
appropriate under the circumstances.
But, you have to maintain the public safety. My answer would be for the public to quit
flying and thereby force the airlines to hire their own security which, in
turn, would obviate the TSA.
TODAY’S QUOTE:
“The government is so out of control. It is so infested with fraud and deceit and
corruption and abuse of power.” ~ Ted Nugent
TODAY’S VIDEO:
No comments:
Post a Comment